Comparing the Influences of Masking, Crowding, Response Conflict, and Cortical Scaling on Simple Shape Identification with Foveal Targets

Authors

Steven J. Haase¹*, Gary D. Fisk², Matthew Worley³, Brendan Rosenberger⁴

¹ Shippensburg University, Psychology Department, 115 FSC, Shippensburg, PA, USA
² Georgia Southwestern State University, Department of Psychology and Sociology, Americus, GA, USA
³ Rockford Park District, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging, Rockford, IL, USA
⁴ Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, PA, USA

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to compare the effects of masking and crowding on simple shape perception. The target stimuli were presented in foveal vision, where masking effects are generally investigated and where crowding effects are typically small compared to peripheral vision. The second experiment investigated the potential involvement of the dorsal visual pathway by testing if a peripheral crowding stimulus could interfere with the perception of a target shape, if it were scaled to account for low visual acuity? The results of both experiments indicated strong congruency effects, especially for pattern and metacontrast masking (which, in some respects, is similar to crowding). Congruency effects were generally weak for distractors presented further from the target. In Experiment 2, cortically scaled distractors only showed a potential influence in the forward masking condition. Perhaps this is an indication of a priming effect from the distant crowding stimuli. Further research might reveal the extent to which crowding displays can test physiologically motivated hypotheses.

Keywords: crowding, masking, congruency effects, dorsal visual pathway

PAGES:137-158

doi:10.24193/cbb.2022.26.08

* Corresponding author:
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.